New Brit report: Authorities have 'right to access of the home'
A British plan to allow local authorities "the right of access to the home" and "the right to speak with each child alone" in order to evaluate homeschooling families and make certain they do what the government wants is a warning about what could happen in the United States, according to the world's largest homeschool advocacy organization.
"On June 11, 2009, a report on home education in England by Graham Badman, a former Managing Director of Children, Families and Education in the County of Kent, was accepted in full by the British Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families," according to today's report from the Home School Legal Defense Association.
"The report makes the case that homeschooling should be extensively regulated in England," the HSLDA continued. "Aside from registering with the state and mandating reports by homeschoolers, the Badman report makes references to balancing the rights of parents with the rights of children. This idea is expressed in the UNCRC."
That is the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, a document that the HSLDA has been warning about for a number of years already.
It has been adopted in the United Kingdom, and it is on its way toward approval in the United States, lacking mainly the approval of two-thirds of the U.S. Senate.
The document, however, grants dozens of "rights" to children, sometimes running roughshod over conflicting parental rights, the organization said.
For example, under the international document parents no longer would be allowed to administer reasonable spankings to their children, children would be granted the authority by the state to choose their own religion, the "best interest of the child" would govern all decisions and give the government the authority to override any parental decision, children would have a legally enforceable "right to leisure" and parents would be required to have their children attend state-sponsored sex education courts.
There is a ParentalRights.org website that notes if approved, the treaty would supersede "the laws of all 50 states on children and parents."
The HSLDA now is sending a very gentle "I told you so" message.
"Ever since the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly and opened to nations across the world for ratification in 1989, HSLDA has been deeply concerned about the implications of this treaty for U.S. homeschoolers, if the U.S. were to ratify the treaty," the organization said today. "We have consistently warned that this treaty could be the vehicle opponents of home education could use to effectively ban or severely regulate homeschooling."
If the U.S. Senate ever approves it, "the UNCRC will automatically supersede all state laws and U.S. judges will be obligated to follow the provisions of the treaty. Currently, family and education laws are state-based; however, ratification of the UNCRC would transfer the jurisdiction for making family and education law to the U.S. Congress. Congress would, in turn, be obligated to follow the U.N. mandates contained in the CRC," the HSLDA said.
A proposed parental rights amendment has been introduced in Congress.
Senator Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina), who is sponsoring the bill in the Senate, notes that it has not been too many years since prayer was challenged in public schools.
"Now we're finding that parental rights are being attacked by courts all over the country," he contends. "And as we look at where this country is going, particularly more association with the United Nations and the U.N. Convention on the rights of the Child, these treaties would supercede all the laws in 50 states."
And it would challenge parental rights in different ways, he argues.
"[It would] outlaw spanking and prohibit parents from raising children in the family religion, negates legal assumptions that parents act in the best interest of their kids," he points out. "Things [like these] that are inconceivable in America are now being contemplated and planned by a number of people."
Those results have already occurred in nations that have signed on to the treaty, and DeMint says it would happen in the United States as well. More than 60 members of Congress have endorsed the amendment, but DeMint believes it will take a grassroots effort to get it passed.
Polling shows that despite having elected perhaps the most liberal president and Congress in history, Americans still have not lurched to the ideological left -- yet they are increasingly dropping their affiliation with the Republican and Democratic parties.
Forty percent of Americans interviewed in national Gallup Poll surveys this year describe their political views as conservative, 35 percent as moderate, and 21 percent as liberal. Michael Franc, vice president for government relations at The Heritage Foundation, says the slight increase for conservatism since last year is a response to what has been happening in Washington.
"The bailout of the auto industry, the micromanaging of corporations, the talk about major expansions of government, passage of massive new amounts of federal spending are all working, I think, to spook a lot of Americans to the point where some of them are now saying, 'this conservative thing looks pretty good,'" he contends.
So far in 2009, Gallup has found an average of 36 percent of Americans considering themselves Democratic, 28 percent Republican, and 37 percent independent. Franc says since last year, there has been a steady migration of Americans from identification with the two major parties to the status of independent.
"What you're seeing here is an enormous amount of dissatisfaction with the current administration and their policies, but the Republicans as a party have not done enough to lure those dissatisfied individuals into their fold," he points out. "And some of these individuals have actually vacated the Republican tent in the last six months to a year, and they haven't been drawn back in yet."
Franc says if Republicans hope to regain the majority in Congress one day, they will have to figure out a way to convince those conservatives to rejoin the GOP.
Gibson anchoring from White House, devoting hours of coverage to health care agenda
Critics are blasting ABC News for its plan to televise blanket coverage of Barack Obama's health care reform initiative, voicing concern that "the media and government [have] become one" and that the network is "virtually turning over news programming to the Obama government" for "a glorified infomercial to promote the Democrat agenda."
The media ethics furor stems from ABC News' announcement that next week the network will devote hours of news coverage to the president's plan, televise a primetime "town hall" discussion on the topic called "Questions for the President: Prescription for America" and anchor its nightly "World News" program from inside the White House.
Republican National Committee Chief of Staff Ken McKay was doubly incensed that ABC News reportedly rejected a Republican request to be allowed a response.
"As the national debate on health care reform intensifies, I am deeply concerned and disappointed with ABC's astonishing decision to exclude opposing voices on this critical issue," McKay wrote in a letter to ABC News President David Westin.
McKay's letter detailed that in addition to the primetime town hall special, ABC News has also announced its "Good Morning America," "World News," "Nightline" and web news "will all feature special programming on the president's health care agenda."
"I am concerned this event will become a glorified infomercial to promote the Democrat agenda," McKay wrote. "The Republican Party should be included in this primetime event, or the DNC should pay for your airtime."
Roger Hedgecock, chairman of the Radio America Free Speech Foundation, suggested ABC News is endangering true freedom of the press by "virtually turning over news programming that night to the Obama government."
"This 'special' will feature Obama government officials promoting the president's proposal for government health care. No opposing views are allowed on the program," Hedgecock wrote in a statement. "For ABC News to present only the Obama government side of this important issue would betray the public interest in a free press."
Further, Hedgecock declared, "ABC News is in danger of becoming a propaganda organ for the Obama government."