Sound The Trumpet : 83 Percent of Statistics Made Up on the Spot

Must Listen

Must Read

What Art Thinks

Pre-Millennialism

Today's Headlines

Sorry... Not Available

Locally Contributed...

Audio

Video

Special Interest

Daily News

7777

“83 Percent of Statistics Made Up on the Spot”
by Canada Free Press - Dr. Tim Ball
September 19th, 2009

Saki (H.H Munro) said, "A little inaccuracy sometimes saves tons of explanation." Today we have tons of inaccuracy and very little explanation. Most inaccuracies come from claims based on non-existent or inadequate historical data, extremely crude estimates, computer model projections, or are simply incorrect. It's prevalent in environmental issues but particularly bad with climate and animal extinctions. The reason is because they're the most politicized, which automatically takes them further from the truth. As Henry Adams said, "Practical politics consists of ignoring the truth."

Speculative and Theoretical Nonsense

A good example is a 2008 report that claimed, "Human activity is wiping out close to one per cent of every other species on Earth every year, a global environmental report said Friday." What absolute rubbish. They can't possibly substantiate these claims. We don't know how many species there are. We are finding new species all the time. We don't have even crude estimates of populations. We don't know how much population numbers vary. What do they mean by "every other"? They should name all the species that comprise their claims?

Numbers in the 2008 Report are part of the ridiculous, completely unscientific, claims made originally by E.O. Wilson about species extinction. Self-proclaimed Canadian environmentalist David Suzuki traveled across the country a few years ago claiming the demise of 2 species an hour. He wouldn't name any of them because it's a false claim. It undoubtedly originated with E.O Wilson, who is listed as an honorary Board member of the Suzuki Foundation in the 2003 Annual Report.

Wilson introduced his idea of extinction based on mathematical estimates and false assumptions. "A good proxy for the rate of extinction is the rate of growth in energy used by the human population. In other words, extinction rates are increasing in step with the product of population growth times the growth in affluence."

Wilson's actual extinction claim was 27,000 per year. He also predicted 22 percent of all species will be extinct by 2022. It's time the media provided a daily obituary column with names of the 48 species provided by the Suzuki Foundation. It won't happen because they don't exist, but that won't stop others making false claims.

Claims of declining numbers work because we're emotionally vulnerable to charges we're negatively impacting animal populations. They work because people believe populations don't change much naturally therefore large or sudden changes are due to humans.

They works because the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) made a statement in their 2007 Impact Report that "Global-scale assessment of observed changes shows that it is likely that anthropogenic warming over the last three decades has had a discernible influence on many physical and biological systems."

This is out of context and unsupportable. The word "likely" is defined as a 66 to 90% probability, which undercuts the certainty of the statement. It's out of context because you can't determine the human effect without knowing or understanding natural change. This is the major problem with the IPCC Science Report on climate so it is not surprising to see it repeated in the Impact Report.

Looking for His glorious appearing! Titus 2:13