
What's that? The "gunman" was a Muslim? He said something about the Qur'an?  Surely not! None of that is in the AP story, which is an object lesson in  journalistic bias and obfuscation: "Source: Chicago gunman heard voices to kill  family," by Don Babwin for Associated Press, April 14: 
CHICAGO - A  person close to the investigation of a shooting in Chicago that left a woman and  three children dead says the gunman told police that he committed the crime  after hearing voices telling him to kill his family.
Compare that to the  Chicago Tribune [which] says that "the man had converted to Islam several years  ago while serving time in prison and had a dispute with his wife - one of the  victims - because she would not adhere to his faith. He told police that he  needed to take his family back to Allah and out of this world of sinners, a  source said....The wife's sister, Shirina Thompson, said the suspect had been  talking about "going to Allah." Both Thompson and a neighbor in Wisconsin said  the man had fought with his wife in recent days because she refused to wear  Muslim garb....Letisha Larry, one of the suspect's sisters, said her brother had  been acting strange, carrying around the Quran and telling family members that something in the book  told him to kill someone."
But AP has none of that. He was just "hearing voices."
The whole process  of news gathering and news reporting needs to be demystified, even in this  Internet age, and news reports recognized not as objective, dispassionate  accounts, but as the work of human beings with agendas. While it is possible  that Kristen Schorsch, Annie Sweeney and Cynthia Dizikes of the Tribune are  simply better, more thorough reporters than Don Babwin of AP, it is more likely  that Babwin had access to exactly the same information that showed up in the  Tribune report, but chose not to go with it.
He probably thought it would  be "Islamophobic" to do so, or that to do so would fuel one of those fabled but  nonexistent "backlashes" against innocent Muslims. So he probably decided it was  better to cover up key facts about this incident. And the thing is, Don Babwin  is no worse a journalist than thousands of others working today. He was just  doing what they all do, in large and small ways, every day.