
As "ClimateGate" continues to unfold, prominent scientists are finding the boldness to speak out.
ClimateGate refers to the e-mails and computer codes that were leaked from climate research centers in the United Kingdom. The e-mails and codes detail how temperature data and climate models were manipulated to show alleged "manmade global warming." (See earlier articles - Article 1 Article 2)
Former science advisor to Lady Margaret Thatcher, Lord Christopher Monckton,  says he was attacked in some of the e-mails. He notes that another eminent  professor of physics in the U.S., David Douglas, was also attacked. According to  Monckton, he was contacted by Douglas and informed that conspirators had delayed  publication of one of his papers that proved climate science was being  overhyped.
 
Monckton explains: "The conspirators managed to get  the publication of the hard copy of that paper delayed by one year so that they  could have time to cobble together a basically fraudulent paper authored by the  man who had rewritten the scientists' version of the 1995 U.N. report so that  where the scientists had said, 'We can't see any human effect on the  temperature,' this man Ben Santer turned it around and wrote the opposite and  said, 'Well, in fact, there is a human effect from this' -- even though the  scientists hadn't said that."
 
The former science advisor labels this  clear evidence that there is interference at high levels in the editorship of  the "learned journals" in which scientific research is published. Criminal  charges are being pursued in this matter. Monckton adds that he is also in  communication with members of both houses of Congress concerning the fraudulent  activities uncovered in ClimateGate.