
 
 
Prime Minister  Binyamin Netanyahu has denied calling White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel  and senior Obama advisor David Axelrod “self-hating Jews." The alleged use of  that term is particularly timely as Jews mourn on Thursday the destruction of  the First and Second Holy Temples; Judaism teaches that “causeless hatred” among  Jews was the reason for the fall of the Second Temple.
Whether or not the  Prime Minister used the term, increasing criticism by American Jews of U.S.  President Barack Obama signals a split in the American Jewish  community.
The trigger for the growing crisis between Israel and the  U.S., and among American Jews, is the issue of “settlements,” which President  Obama labeled as “illegitimate” in his speech in Cairo nearly two months ago. He  later included Jewish communities in eastern Jerusalem as part of the  “settlement” label.
President Obama revealed this week that his White  House advisor Rahm Emanuel, whose father was an Israeli and part of the  underground resistance movement under the British Mandate, tells him everything  he needs to know about Israel.
Emanuel also is the man who choreographed  the handshake between former President Bill Clinton, former Prime Minister  Yitzchak Rabin and Yasser Arafat on the White House lawn.
He has  pushed the president into a head-on collision with the Netanyahu government, but  there is a growing opinion that he has also left the president out on a limb.  Emanuel’s strategy was to demonstrate that the pro-Israel lobby American Israel  Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) no longer speaks for American  Jewry.
Mondoweis Blogger Philip Weis, who continually attacks a Jewish  presence in Judea and Samaria and eastern Jerusalem, wrote last month, “Obama's  game is to defeat the Israel lobby from within. He could not defeat the lobby  from outside it…. But now he is cracking it like a nut, and counting on Jews to  do the cracking.”
That strategy has turned into a wall of opposition,  both in Israel, where the president’s popularity rating is near-zero, in the  U.S. where Emanuel has simply ignored opposing views of major Jewish  organizations, and in the normally anti-settlement American press.
Washington Post vs. Obama
The liberal and  highly influential Washington Post has criticized President Obama on his policy  towards Israel, and an editorial on Thursday went even further. Under the title  “Tough on Israel - Why: President Obama's battle against Jewish settlements  could prove self-defeating,” the newspaper’s editors wrote:
“One of the  more striking results of the Obama administration's first six months is that  only one country has worse relations with the United States than it did in  January: Israel. The new administration has pushed a reset button with Russia  and sent new ambassadors to Syria and Venezuela; it has offered olive branches  to Cuba and Burma. But for nearly three months it has been locked in a public  confrontation with Israel over Jewish housing construction in Jerusalem and the  West Bank.”
The editorial criticized the president for his “absolutist  demand” for a freeze on all building for Jews in Judea and Samaria and eastern  Jerusalem. “Palestinian and Arab leaders who had accepted previous compromises  immediately hardened their positions; they also balked at delivering the  ‘confidence-building’ concessions to Israel that the administration seeks.  Israeli public opinion, which normally leans against the settler movement, has  rallied behind Mr. Netanyahu.”
The newspaper warned that any compromise  by President Obama may leave him “diminished among both Israelis and  Arabs.”
The turning point against President Obama may have been the  meeting in the White House earlier this month with American Jewish leaders. The  Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations requested a  discussion with President Obama, but Emanuel decided who would attend.  
He used the opportunity to attempt to create an impression of solid  support for President Obama and show off the relative new J Street lobby. Unlike  AIPAC, it is active politically and endorsed and campaigned for Congressional  candidates who fit their agenda, which includes Israel’s surrendering all of  Judea and Samaria and parts of Jerusalem that were restored to the Jewish State  in the 1967 Six-Day War.
At the same time, he excluded National Council  of Young Israel (NCYI) and the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA), both of  which support a Jewish presence in all of Israel.
The latest  confrontation on a new project for Jews in eastern Jerusalem prompted Alan  Solow, chairman of the Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, to  state this week, "Hundreds of Arab families have moved into Jewish neighborhoods  of Jerusalem and the same right should be accorded to Jewish residents to live  wherever they choose in Jerusalem. No government of Israel has or can pursue a  discriminatory policy that would prevent the legitimate presence of Jews in any  area of the capital."
In response, five leftist groups, including  Americans for Peace Now and J Street, criticized supporters of Jews’ rights to  build in the area. It added, “Unilateral actions that inflame tensions, impair  negotiations and make the ultimate resolution of issues surrounding Jerusalem  more difficult are unhelpful and should be avoided at this particularly  sensitive moment."
While Emanuel is trying to strengthen his  position, he faces another challenge on the Obama administration’s health plan.  Emanuel’s brother Dr. Ezekiel Emmanuel is Obama’s “health czar,” and the plan is  being widely panned in American media, leaving the White House Chief of Staff  with two potential failures for the President.