
Rufin  Anthony, the bishop of Islamabad, has denounced the culpable silence of  Muslim leaders who have failed to forcefully condemn what is being  called “the worst religiously motivated hate crime in Pakistan's  history”—the recent murder of a Christian couple in Pakistan. 
 
 Summary executions of religious minorities accused of blasphemy in  Pakistan has met with complacency and even approval, says Anthony. “In  the past,” he said, when vigilantes have taken the law into their own  hands, “religious leaders have carefully refrained from expressing words  of condemnation. In fact, they have practically encouraged personal  vendettas.”
 
 Anthony said that the blame for current problems falls to those  who have countenanced it earlier. “If appropriate measures had been  taken in the past,” he said, “this barbarism could have been averted.”
 
 On November 4, Shahzad Masih and his pregnant wife Shama Bibia,  the parents of four children, were stoned and then burned alive at a  brick kiln in Pakistan. The two victims were killed by an angry mob of  hundreds of people stirred up by a local religious leader for allegedly  burning pages of the Qur’an.
 
 Many have begun asking how a blasphemy law that justifies killing in the name of religion can exist in today’s world.
 
 Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, the President of the Pontifical  Council for Interreligious Dialogue, said he was “shocked and  speechless” by the recent execution. The worst thing about it, he said,  “is that it was carried out in the name of religion. Religion cannot  justify a crime like this.”
 
 “There is this law against blasphemy,” he went on “which  represents a problem: shouldn’t the international community intervene? I  ask you: can we remain passive before crimes that are legitimized by  religion?”
 
 Tauran said that the first victims of this outrage are the Muslims  themselves, “because these crimes give Islam a terrible, very negative  image. They should be the first to denounce them forcefully,” he said.
 
 Despite the horror of these crimes, Muslim officials continue to look for scapegoats and place blame elsewhere.
 
 The president of the Ulema (Council of Muslim scholars) of  Pakistan, Muhammad Tahir Ashrafi, blamed local police for the crime. In a  statement, Ashrafi condemned the violence but said it “would not have  happened if the local police had not shown negligence.”
 
 Since its inception, the blasphemy law has been applied brutally  against religious minorities. In 2012, a teenaged Christian girl with  Down Syndrome, Rimsha Masih, was arrested under the blasphemy laws, and  released on bail. She and her family had to be relocated because of  threats against them.
 
 In 2011, two politicians – Salmaan Taseer, a Muslim, and Shahbaz  Bhatti, a Catholic – were assassinated for opposing the blasphemy laws. 
 
 Yet Ashrafi has refused to question the blasphemy law that has  encouraged these brutalities, preferring instead to blame the local  police. 
 
 If the couple was really guilty, Ashrafi’s statement asks, “why  did the police not arrest them after complaints from local residents?”  And if they were not guilty, “why were they not given immediate  protection, in view of the enraged reaction of the people?”
 
 So far the police have stopped some forty people for questioning but there have been no official charges.
A recent Pew poll showed that 75 percent of Pakistanis believe: “Blasphemy laws are necessary to protect Islam in our country.” Pakistan’s blasphemy laws entail that insulting the prophet is punishable by death.