
According  to California State University's mission statement, the university  seeks to "advance and extend knowledge, learning, and culture..." and to  "provide opportunities for individuals to develop intellectually,  personally, and professionally". Their mission statement goes on to say  that, in order to achieve these and other stated goals, the university  promises that it "provides and environment in which scholarship,  research, creative, artistic, and professional activity are valued and  supported".
 
 However, these lofty mission goals were put to the test recently  when Mark Armitage, who worked as a researcher at the university's  Northridge location and supervised the university's electron microscope  laboratory, discovered evidence that contradicted the university's  position on evolution.
 
 Mr. Armitage, a respected scientist and a member of several  respected professional organizations, including the American Society of  Parasitologists, the Southern California Academy of Sciences, and the  Microscopy Society of America, was conducting research on 
 
 Microscopy Society of America, the American Society of  Parasitologists, and the Southern California Academy of Sciences, was  conducting experiments on a triceratops horn, which he had discovered in  2012 in Montana. During the course of his examination of the  triceratops horn, he placed it under a high-powered microscope and  discovered the presence of soft tissue on the bones.
 
 The presence of soft tissue on a dinosaur bone directly  contradicts evolutionary theory because soft tissue indicates that the  bone has not been fossilized. Evolutionary theory teaches that it takes  millions of years for bones to become fossilized, and the commonly-held  evolutionary explanation of dinosaurs is that they perished some sixty  million years ago. 
 
 Professor Armitage is not the only scientist who has discovered  the presence of soft tissue on dinosaur bones. Paleontologist Mary  Schweitzer discovered the presence of soft tissue on tyrannosaurus rex  discoveries in 1997, 2005, and 2007. She went on to publish a scientific  report on a hadrosaur in Science magazine, wherein her results were  verified by a third party to offset the challenges her research was  getting from the scientific community. Her research showed that,  according to accepted biochemical decay rates, the soft tissue "would be  dust by now", if the millions of years figure was used to date the  find. In other words, the dinosaur bones she found, with the soft  tissue, could not be millions of years old either.
 
 The scientific community has always been very guarded on the  subject of evolution, and has been extremely defensive against anything  that goes against their established theories. There have been accounts  of destruction of bones, falsification of data, and suppression of  evidence that goes against evolutionary theory over the years. The  peppered moth story, told in textbooks for decades, was shown to be  falsified to support natural selection.
 
 When Professor Armitage discovered the presence of soft tissue  under the microscope, he initially shared his findings with his  students, who were fascinated by the findings. One of these students,  however, reported the findings to Professor Armitage's supervisor, who  was not amused. According to Armitage, the supervisor stormed into his  office and declared to Armitage that "[w]e will not tolerate your  religion in this department!" While Armitage is a professing Christian,  the goal of any science department should be to uncover the truth,  regardless of the religious views of the scientist making the discovery.  However, the exclamatory remark by the supervisor reveals that his  anti-Christian bias, and his own religious following of evolutionary  theory, is far more important than his own scientific curiosity.
 
 After the outburst by his supervisor, Professor Armitage was  promised by the head of the biology department that his religious views  would be respected and that the supervisor's outburst was an "isolated  incident", the working environment for Professor Armitage got  progressively worse.
 
 Professor Armitage published his findings concerning the presence  of soft tissue in a peer-reviewed journal, Acta Histochemica.  He  explained that the purpose of his article was to merely present the  evidence that he discovered of the soft tissue. His article did not  promote creationism, or promote his Christian worldview in any way. In  fact, he did not offer any conclusions in the article. He explained  that: “The only conclusions I drew were that ‘This needs to be  investigated further. We have a lot of work to do.’ And that was it.”
 
 It would seem that a mere presentation of factual data and the  call to investigate the matter further would not evoke a strong reaction  from the scientific community, or the university which is supposedly  dedicated to scientific research and "extend[ing] knowledge, learning,  and culture", but he was told by the university that his article's  findings were not acceptable to the university. No one has questioned  the factual nature of his findings, but just that the facts he presented  are not to be presented.
 
 California State University has 447,000 students and 45,000  faculty and staff members in its 23 campuses across California. At the  Northridge campus alone, almost 37,000 students attend the school. Their  budget reflects an anticipated 5% increase in enrollment for the coming  academic year. However, one has to question the academic credentials of  any university that so guards against the dissemination of the truth to  its students, and to the scientific community as a whole.
 
 Armitage explained that two weeks after the publication of his  article, he was told by the head of the department that his three-year  appointment was temporary. He was told that there wasn't sufficient  funding for his position and he was dismissed. At no time prior was he  told that his appointment was temporary, or that funding would be an  issue in continuing his position.
 Professor Armitage, who has been a scientist for over thirty  years, is now suing the university, with the help of the Pacific Justice  Institute, because he believes that his termination was wrongfully  based on his religious beliefs and the publication of his peer-reviewed  article.
 
 Brad Dacus, who is with the Pacific Justice Institute, stated that  Professor Armitage's dismissal based on his religious views is  "completely inappropriate and illegal". He is even more concerned,  however, with the university's "attempt to silence speech at a public  university". Both are subjects of concern in any publically-funded  university, particularly in light of the ongoing attacks against  conservative and Christian free speech at universities across the United  States, as well as campuses in Europe.