
A  Christian organization in the United Kingdom on Wednesday launched its  legal challenge to the ultimate “Big Brother” law – a Scottish plan that  appoints a government official to oversee the life of each newborn.
 
 “We are making a stand for all mums and dads who are doing their  best for the children they love,” said Colin Hart, director of the  Christian Institute.
 
 He confirmed that papers were lodged at Edinburgh’s Court of  Sessions by the Institute, several other organizations and parents who  would be subjected to the law’s requirements.
 
 The “Named Person” initiative, the Institute has explained, would  “see a state guardian assigned to every child between birth and  18-years-old.”
 
 Those government officials would have access to all information  about the child, whether the parents allow it or not, and could make  recommendations and suggestions about the upbringing of the child.
 
 Parents would be allowed to decline their advice, but then those  government officials would “be able to share information with a wide  range of public authorities and may intervene without parental consent.”
 
 While the law is set to be imposed nationwide by 2016, it already is being       implemented in some areas.
 
 The Institute said the challenge was joined by Christian charity  CARE, Tymes Trust and the Family Education Trust as well as parents  James and Rhianwen McIntosh and Deborah Thomas.
 
 The Institute explained the McIntoshes reported last month that  they already were being subjected to the law when they were told their  child’s private medical documents were being shared with the  state-employed “named person.”
 
 “I love my child better than anyone else and so for the government  to tell me that I needed someone who knew better about my child to see  to their well being, that was really quite belittling to me as a  parent,” said Rhianwen McIntosh.
 
 Thomas reported discovering the reaches of the law’s tentacles  when her son was told to fill out a “creepy and weird” survey at school.  She discovered questions were about “things like his perceptions of our  family’s income, the seriousness of our family’s arguments, and whether  he sometimes felt like he couldn’t go on – which is effectively a  suicide question.”
 
 “This marks the beginning of a landmark case which has  implications for every family in Scotland,” said Hart. “We are not  prepared to stand by and watch as the roles of parents and their rights  to a family life are diminished and trampled over by an authoritarian  big brother government intent on making its presence felt in every  living room in the land.”
 
 He said the idea behind the law may have been to prevent children  who have needs from slipping through the net, but “that safety net will  only be stretched to [a] breaking point as a result of this policy,  raising the prospect that genuine child protection cases will fall  through the holes.”
 
 The BBC reported that the government has argued the plan will help  with “vulnerable children,” but its critics say in simply violates the  European Convention on Human Rights, which recognizes parental  authority.
 
 WND reported several weeks ago that physicians already were  telling parents, “We are now required to inform the Named Person for  your child if your child fails to attend an appointment.”
 
 The Institute reported one family who received the letter told the  Scottish Daily Mail: “We were absolutely shocked. The health board  seems to be acting in advance of the law being implemented.”
 
 “I shows the extent to which the law will impact on families and their private lives,” the family continued.
 
 The Children and Young People Act, however, already has been  condemned by a prominent human rights lawyer, Aidan O’Neill, who said in  a legal opinion that the measure amounted to “unjustified interference”  and “may be unlawful.”
 
 He said the European Convention on Human Rights calls for governments to respect “private and family life.”
 
 WND has reported the idea for a government watchdog for each child comes from the philosophy of the United Nations.
 
 “This law shows the natural progression for a country that has  ratified the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child and attempts to  live up to its treaty provisions,” said Michael Donnelly, the director  of international relations for Home School Legal Defense Association.
 
 HSLDA has been exposing the pitfalls of the U.N. treaty, which has not been adopted by the United States.