
Imagine that in recent weeks alone, dozens of Muslims around the world had  been murdered by Christian extremists armed with suicide belts and similar  paraphernalia.
 Imagine that at the same time, around other parts of  the world, Christian mobs had set fire to, and burned to the ground, the holy  places of some of the oldest and most established Muslim communities in the  world.
 Do you think there would be a reaction to such events?  Probably yes.
 Would that reaction be wholly negative and unceasing  in its condemnation? Probably yes.
 Would it be remotely conceivable  that a senior U.S. government official or advisor would have used the  opportunity to claim that Muslims who had been targeted had brought it upon  themselves? Probably no.
 Welcome then to the mirror-image of the  real-world persecution of Christians that is going on across the globe  today.
 And say hello again to two of the most appallingly  over-promoted and sinister figures involved with the current U.S. government:  Mohamed Elibiary and Dalia Mogahed.
 Of course, you may not want to:  as the terror goes on worldwide, and the situation around the globe slips  continuously in the Islamists' general direction, there is a growing and  terrific ennui among much of the West. Among much of the Western world,  terrorists' marauding is another case of, "Oh, just that Islamism  again." 
 You say a person is not good? Well, we can't be  bothered to find out. The very condition that so few people can raise themselves  to be bothered is part of the problem: "The trouble with all the nice people I  knew in Germany," the British author Stephen Spender wrote in his Berlin diary  in the 1930s, "is that they were either tired or weak."
 Thankfully  there are a number of people who can still rouse themselves to point out how  outrageous Western governments' hiring policies are these days -- as when  Mohamed Elibiary was promoted to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's  Advisory Council. Yet despite these heroic individuals pointing out Elibiary's  track record of support for Islamists worldwide, the appointment held -- and so  it was that the U.S. government welcomed another fox into its chicken  coop.
 Now an American official can not only fail to stand by  America's friends – he can actually blame them for the persecution they are  suffering.
 Over recent days, one of the effects of this has already  been felt: in September, when violence against Egypt's Copts had reached another  peak, the new Department of Homeland Security Homeland Security Advisor,  Elibiary, used his twitter account to blame American Coptic activists for the  murder of their co-religionists by Muslim Brotherhood extremists of the type  Elibiary has a track record of supporting.
 On September 15, he  wrote, "For decade since 9/11 attack extremist American Coptic activists have  nurtured anti Islam and anti Muslim sentiments among AM RT wing." A day earlier,  Elibiary blamed American Copts for protesting against attacks on their relatives  in Egypt, and recommended an article "on need to reform #Coptic activism in #US  including stop promoting #Islamophobia."
 So while Copts were  actually being targeted and killed in Egypt, Mr. Elbiary chose to try to switch  attention onto the fictional persecution of Muslims in the U.S. There is nothing  quite like someone excusing one crime-in-progress by citing a non-existent other  crime -- except for, of course, a U.S. government official doing the  same.
 Unfortunately, thanks to our enthusiastic,  politically-correct attitudes and radical Islamist ideologies, Elibiary is not  alone in the U.S. administration.
 It was Dalia Mogahed, you will  recall, who helped President Obama draft the 2009 Cairo Speech -- a "reset"  speech, regarded as seminal across several rooms in the White House. It was  Mogahed who helped draft the address which apologized for America's past actions  while giving the benefit of the doubt to most of its self-stated  enemies.
 Mogahed is not only one of the geniuses credited with that  speech; her record also includes other glowing occasions. Such as the time, that  same year, in which she cropped up on a U.K. television program, which aired on  the most notorious satellite Islamist channel. 
 Mogahed took  part in a discussion about the empowerment of women through Sharia. She  participated, seemingly happily, in the program hosted -- and introduced as such  -- by a member of the radical Islamist group Hizb-ut-Tahrir. Mogahed also seemed  unfazed when, for instance, passionate fellow participants called for the  restoration of the Caliphate (a key pipedream of Hizb-ut-Tahrir).
 Incidents like that have been used against her. But these things have a tendency  to come and go. A little flare-up of bad publicity here, the rebuttal of  legitimate concerns and an accusation of "Islamophobia" there -- it is all part  of the mood-music.
 Dalia Mogahed's latest popping-up however, makes  all her previous ones not only explicable but mild:
 After 80 Coptic  churches had been burned down by Brotherhood supporters, Ms. Mogahed decided to  single out for criticism not the perpetrators but --- the Egyptian media! "The  Egyptian media took advantage of the Copts to achieve many personal/political  gains which has angered the West," she wrote on one of the Facebook pages to  which she spends her time contributing: 
"Egyptian Americans for Democracy and Human Rights." All of which adds  up to one of the strangest sets of messages any American government has surely  ever given out.
 If you were one of those Christian Copts standing  in the ruins of your village or church, what message would you take from all  this? 
 If the officials of the current U.S. administration are  managing to blame the media, or even fellow Copts in the U.S., for your  slaughter and the desecration of your churches, would it be any surprise if they  took the message that the current U.S. administration is not just indifferent to  the suffering of Christians across the Middle East and the rest of the world,  but actively asking them, "Would you mind dying quietly, please?