
The arrest of the Jerusalem Mufti on Tuesday for throwing chairs at Jews on the  Temple Mount prompted the Jordanian parliament on Wednesday to demand that King  Abdullah expel the Israeli envoy. The legislators also called to start a draft  for a law to scrap the peace treaty with Israel.
 Police arrested an  Arab from entering the Temple Mount, and an enraged Grand Mufti and other Arabs  began throwing plastic chairs at five Jews who entered the Temple Mount under  police escort. Arab media said they prostrated themselves, an act of prayer that  the Waqf prohibits, except for Muslims.
 Police spokesman Micky  Rosenfeld told The Washington Post the group did not carry out any act of  prayer. As usual, Palestinian Authority media exaggerated the entire scene. Arab  media always report that Jews “stormed” the Temple Mount. The Bethlehem-based  Ma’an news agency reported that 50, and not five, Jews prostrated  themselves.
 Israeli police stepped in to end the clash before it  could get out of hand and arrested the Mufti, a rare action.
 It did  not take much time for Jordan to hear of the altercation, and the country’s  parliament unanimously agreed that the kingdom should expel the Israeli  ambassador and recall its own ambassador from Tel Aviv. The parliament added its  own imagination to the facts and claimed that Israel is trying to build a bridge  between the Al Aqsa mosque and Jerusalem “settlements.” The parliament also  called for drafting legislation to scrap the peace treaty with Israel.
 Several hours later, Israel released the Mufti, which probably was not  related to the Jordanian parliament’s move. The government knows full well that  the Arab world will not sit passive with the Jerusalem Mufti being taken from  his home for interrogation.
 The U.S. State Department was asked by  reporters to comment on the fuss, and assistant spokesman Patrick Ventrell told  them, “We urge all sides to respect the status quo of this holy site and to  exercise restraint and refrain from provocative actions.
 As usual,  the State Dept. does not what it is talking about.
 Status quo? From  when? From 1967?
 The Israeli government passed the Protection of  Holy Places Law on June 27, 1967.
 It states:
“The Holy  Places shall be protected from desecration and any other violation and from  anything likely to violate the freedom of access of the members of the different  religions to the places sacred to them or their feelings with regard to those  places.”
The wise State Dept. does not also know much about the Mufti,  Muhammad Ahmad Hussein.
 In 2006, he stated that suicide bombings of  Israelis were “legitimate, of course, as long as it plays a role in the  resistance.”
On the other hand, one could say he simply was maintaining  the status quo, which the Oslo Accords and the peace treaty with Jordan  changed.
 Jordan controlled the Temple Mount until the Six-Day War  in 1967. Before then, Amman did not let Jews visit holy sites in the Old City of  Jerusalem. It also prohibited Christians from most churches and holy sites in  the Old City, Judea and Samaria, except for few and far between visiting foreign  dignitaries.
 After Jerusalem was restored to Israel in 1967, the  Israeli government didn’t want to have much to do with the Temple Mount for many  reasons, not the least of which was the concern of a religious war with Muslims  as well as the complicated and complex issue in Jewish law of whether it is even  permitted for a Jew to ascend to the site of the destroyed First and Second  Temples.
 The government left authority for the Temple Mount site in  the hands of the Muslim Waqf site, with the stipulation that Israeli police  could patrol the site and enter the mosque area, if necessary.
 The  “status quo” ended in 1969, when an Australian evangelical Christian tried to  burn down the mosque to hasten the Second Coming, if not World War III.