
 The Syrian crisis unbelievably took another turn for the worse Saturday, Dec.  29: After making no headway with Bashar Assad in Damascus, the UN-Arab League  envoy Lakhdar Brahimi was told in no uncertain terms by Russian Foreign Minister  Sergei Lavrov in Moscow: “There is no possibility of persuading Syrian ruler  Bashar Assad to leave Syria.” As they spoke, a record 400 people died in  hostilities in the country. The burnt remains of hundreds of people slaughtered  by the army were discovered in a Homs district. And Syrian opposition leaders  have repeatedly preconditioned their acceptance of the Russian invitation to  talks on Assad’s prior exit. In effect, both sides to the conflict appear to have resorted to a form of  chemical warfare. Western and Middle East military sources report that, last  week, Syrian forces loyal to Assad are thought to have used in the Homs battle  of Dec. 23 grenades containing a gas that paralyzes lungs and causes extreme  infirmity, or even death. Those sources were careful to point out that the gas was most likely “a  concentrated irritant,” but not one of the deadly chemical weapons stockpiled by  the Assad regime. They were equally careful to avoid indentifying its origin.  debkafile’s intelligence  sources disclose that these gas grenades were especially developed by Iran’s  Revolutionary Guards Corps for use against the masses which demonstrated against  the 2009 presidential elections. The grenades have now been distributed to  pro-Assad Shabiha militias, the Syrian equivalent of Iran’s brutal al Qods  Brigades. In Amman, the Jordanian information minister Sameeh Maaytah, said Sunday,  Dec. 30, that his government is prepared for any chemical threat on the kingdom  but will not enter into “any alliance” to protect itself. debkafile’s military sources  point out that only the first half of the Jordanian statement is correct. The  other half is as unreal as most of the comments on the chemical weapons peril  heard from Western powers, Russia, Israel or Arab spokesmen. It is a fact that  Jordan has after all entered into close alliance with NATO, not to mention the  US, for protecting the kingdom. This alliance goes forward on six tracks: 1. Learning how to treat victims of a potential Syrian chemical attack; 2.  Setting up an American-Jordanian headquarters in Amman for coordinated  operations against this threat, similar to the joint outfits the US has  established in Israel and Turkey. The Americans have imported to Jordan a  military field hospital specializing in the treatment of chemical warfare  victims; 3.  Since last summer, US Army Green Berets, which specialize in chemical  warfare, have been training Jordanian troops; 4. Czech and Polish military units, expert in chemical and biological  warfare, are also in the Hashemite kingdom.  They are not only  teaching Jordanian units how to combat chemical warfare, but also Syrian  rebels; 6. The Jordanian army units deployed between the areas around Amman and close  to the northern Jordanian border with Syria were issued last week with  anti-contamination masks and suits. All in all, the United States and NATO have prepared Jordan exhaustively for  a possible Syrian chemical weapons attack. If this happens, some intelligence  sources estimate Israel or Turkey may be targeted next.  Given the Syrian  conflict’s sequential plunge into unspeakable atrocities, Israel cannot count on  being exempt from a poison weapons attack - even before its Jan. 22 general  election.
This stalemate is compounded by escalation in  the use of two extreme weapons of war. Since Dec. 12, the Syrian army has been  firing home-made Scud missiles at rebel centers. The US and NATO have responded  by stationing six Patriot batteries manned by 1,000 American, German and Dutch  servicemen, on the Turkish-Syrian border to protect Turkey from Syrian attack.  The inference here is that so long as the Scuds are confined to targets inside  Syria, Western intervention will stop at the border. 
Then on Dec. 26, The  Syrian army, under the command of Iranian officers, began shooting Fateh A-110  high-precision, short-range surface missiles made in Iran. They were sent to  Syria at top speed by an Iranian airlift flying over Iraq. Syria in fact  manufactures a local version of the Fateh A-110, called M600.  But Tehran  decided to deliver the originals to show the world that Assad is not fighting  alone and that Iran’s military support for his regime is solid – not just  against the uprising, but also against NATO, its missiles and the units which  have taken  up position in Turkey.
The gas grenades were brought out on Dec. 22, the day after the  Syrian Presidential Guard reported that seven of its number had died in battle  near Damascus as a result of a weapon used by the rebels which “produced a  yellow toxic gas.”
This allegation may have been trumped up to justify the  pro-Assad forces’ use of toxic gas grenades in Homs. Be that as may, both sides  appear to be preparing the ground for chemical warfare. Yet no Western, or any  other external power, including Russia, appears ready to intervene to put a stop  to the latest horror raising its head in the Syrian conflict, the escalation to  chemical warfare - any more than they prevented its descent to the bombardment  of civilians by missiles.
Several media  attributed the minister’s comment to the visit Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin  Netanyahu paid to Amman last week for talks with King Abdullah,  purportedly about the Syrian chemical weapons threat they share.
5. US and Jordanian special units are standing ready for orders to  enter Syria and attack the sites of the chemical weapons positioned for shooting  into Jordan and Israel;